HARI itu, 15 Agustus 1945, Jepang akhirnya takluk kepada tentara Sekutu. Di saat-saat akhir kekuasaannya, Jepang sempat menjanjikan kemerdekaan kepada Indonesia. Maka dibentuklah Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia oleh Jepang. Soekarno dan Hatta menjadi ketua dan wakil ketua Panitia Persiapan.
Sjahrir tak percaya dengan janji itu. Bersama sejumlah aktivis pergerakan lainnya, seperti Adam Malik, Soekarni, Chaerul Saleh, dan Kusnaeni, ia tak ingin kemerdekaan Indonesia didapat sebagai hadiah dari Jepang. Para pemuda menuduh Soekarno-Hatta sebagai kolaborator Jepang. Hanya, meski berbeda paham, Sjahrir mengakui rakyat di daerah sangat mendukung kemerdekaan dan kepemimpinan Soekarno-Hatta.
1 comment:
THE HUMAN - NORMALITY VS INSANITY
=================================
Your last question is very smart one, so I wont answer it, he2... (And I just never like the ramifications of it)
The Case...
===========
I read a little about "The Watchmen" and it is so interesting.
This "Rorschach" character shows how much people absolutely sees any of those who never tolerate his opposite will never survive on this world, and should humans tolerate others peace will be achieve: even though that means to cooperate with criminals.
So the movie it self is a total failure of example of good ending. As there is no such real events in the world.
Rorschach is not also a good example of fully "right-side" person. So actually people see the world from their own eyes, and think with their own brains, and conclude their own opinion who actually is "nuts".
So actually there is no objectivity, the thing is called "the majority's opinion." If you fail to follow that you will be bullied, called to be "freak", etc.
So even, to have a lot of friends or many enemies or lead a happy life or even tragical life is not a clue that someone lives "properly."
The Question
============
1. So what are the standards of living "correctly."?
2. From what point should human sees?
3. How to lead those standards?
--------------------------------
This is nice brain working... What do you think?
*Dont ask me what is the relation of what I wrote with this-your article. You should understand that the answers of the question should lead how you should see and treat "Sutan Sjahrir" and all of his kinds "objectively." Or may be "subjectively." Well this is called "to understand things."
Post a Comment